You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
204 lines
8.7 KiB
204 lines
8.7 KiB
3 years ago
|
0.21.1 Release Notes
|
||
|
====================
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bitcoin Core version 0.21.1 is now available from:
|
||
|
|
||
|
<https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.21.1/>
|
||
|
|
||
|
This minor release includes various bug fixes and performance
|
||
|
improvements, as well as updated translations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Please report bugs using the issue tracker at GitHub:
|
||
|
|
||
|
<https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues>
|
||
|
|
||
|
To receive security and update notifications, please subscribe to:
|
||
|
|
||
|
<https://bitcoincore.org/en/list/announcements/join/>
|
||
|
|
||
|
How to Upgrade
|
||
|
==============
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you are running an older version, shut it down. Wait until it has completely
|
||
|
shut down (which might take a few minutes in some cases), then run the
|
||
|
installer (on Windows) or just copy over `/Applications/Bitcoin-Qt` (on Mac)
|
||
|
or `bitcoind`/`bitcoin-qt` (on Linux).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Upgrading directly from a version of Bitcoin Core that has reached its EOL is
|
||
|
possible, but it might take some time if the data directory needs to be migrated. Old
|
||
|
wallet versions of Bitcoin Core are generally supported.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Compatibility
|
||
|
==============
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bitcoin Core is supported and extensively tested on operating systems
|
||
|
using the Linux kernel, macOS 10.12+, and Windows 7 and newer. Bitcoin
|
||
|
Core should also work on most other Unix-like systems but is not as
|
||
|
frequently tested on them. It is not recommended to use Bitcoin Core on
|
||
|
unsupported systems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
From Bitcoin Core 0.20.0 onwards, macOS versions earlier than 10.12 are no
|
||
|
longer supported. Additionally, Bitcoin Core does not yet change appearance
|
||
|
when macOS "dark mode" is activated.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Notable changes
|
||
|
===============
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Taproot Soft Fork
|
||
|
|
||
|
Included in this release are the mainnet and testnet activation
|
||
|
parameters for the taproot soft fork (BIP341) which also adds support
|
||
|
for schnorr signatures (BIP340) and tapscript (BIP342).
|
||
|
|
||
|
If activated, these improvements will allow users of single-signature
|
||
|
scripts, multisignature scripts, and complex contracts to all use
|
||
|
identical-appearing commitments that enhance their privacy and the
|
||
|
fungibility of all bitcoins. Spenders will enjoy lower fees and the
|
||
|
ability to resolve many multisig scripts and complex contracts with the
|
||
|
same efficiency, low fees, and large anonymity set as single-sig users.
|
||
|
Taproot and schnorr also include efficiency improvements for full nodes
|
||
|
such as the ability to batch signature verification. Together, the
|
||
|
improvements lay the groundwork for future potential
|
||
|
upgrades that may improve efficiency, privacy, and fungibility further.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Activation for taproot is being managed using a variation of BIP9
|
||
|
versionbits called Speedy Trial (described in BIP341). Taproot's
|
||
|
versionbit is bit 2, and nodes will begin tracking which blocks signal
|
||
|
support for taproot at the beginning of the first retarget period after
|
||
|
taproot’s start date of 24 April 2021. If 90% of blocks within a
|
||
|
2,016-block retarget period (about two weeks) signal support for taproot
|
||
|
prior to the first retarget period beginning after the time of 11 August
|
||
|
2021, the soft fork will be locked in, and taproot will then be active
|
||
|
as of block 709632 (expected in early or mid November).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Should taproot not be locked in via Speedy Trial activation, it is
|
||
|
expected that a follow-up activation mechanism will be deployed, with
|
||
|
changes to address the reasons the Speedy Trial method failed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This release includes the ability to pay taproot addresses, although
|
||
|
payments to such addresses are not secure until taproot activates.
|
||
|
It also includes the ability to relay and mine taproot transactions
|
||
|
after activation. Beyond those two basic capabilities, this release
|
||
|
does not include any code that allows anyone to directly use taproot.
|
||
|
The addition of taproot-related features to Bitcoin Core's wallet is
|
||
|
expected in later releases once taproot activation is assured.
|
||
|
|
||
|
All users, businesses, and miners are encouraged to upgrade to this
|
||
|
release (or a subsequent compatible release) unless they object to
|
||
|
activation of taproot. If taproot is locked in, then upgrading before
|
||
|
block 709632 is highly recommended to help enforce taproot's new rules
|
||
|
and to avoid the unlikely case of seeing falsely confirmed transactions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Miners who want to activate Taproot should preferably use this release
|
||
|
to control their signaling. The `getblocktemplate` RPC results will
|
||
|
automatically be updated to signal once the appropriate start has been
|
||
|
reached and continue signaling until the timeout occurs or taproot
|
||
|
activates. Alternatively, miners may manually start signaling on bit 2
|
||
|
at any time; if taproot activates, they will need to ensure they update
|
||
|
their nodes before block 709632 or non-upgraded nodes could cause them to mine on
|
||
|
an invalid chain. See the [versionbits
|
||
|
FAQ](https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/06/08/version-bits-miners-faq/) for
|
||
|
details.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more information about taproot, please see the following resources:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Technical specifications
|
||
|
- [BIP340 Schnorr signatures for secp256k1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki)
|
||
|
- [BIP341 Taproot: SegWit version 1 spending rules](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki)
|
||
|
- [BIP342 Validation of Taproot scripts](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0342.mediawiki)
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Popular articles;
|
||
|
- [Taproot Is Coming: What It Is, and How It Will Benefit Bitcoin](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/taproot-coming-what-it-and-how-it-will-benefit-bitcoin)
|
||
|
- [What do Schnorr Signatures Mean for Bitcoin?](https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-do-schnorr-signatures-mean-for-bitcoin)
|
||
|
- [The Schnorr Signature & Taproot Softfork Proposal](https://blog.bitmex.com/the-schnorr-signature-taproot-softfork-proposal/)
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Development history overview
|
||
|
- [Taproot](https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/taproot/)
|
||
|
- [Schnorr signatures](https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/schnorr-signatures/)
|
||
|
- [Tapscript](https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/tapscript/)
|
||
|
- [Soft fork activation](https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/soft-fork-activation/)
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Other
|
||
|
- [Questions and answers related to taproot](https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/taproot)
|
||
|
- [Taproot review](https://github.com/ajtowns/taproot-review)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Updated RPCs
|
||
|
------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Due to [BIP 350](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0350.mediawiki)
|
||
|
being implemented, behavior for all RPCs that accept addresses is changed when
|
||
|
a native witness version 1 (or higher) is passed. These now require a Bech32m
|
||
|
encoding instead of a Bech32 one, and Bech32m encoding will be used for such
|
||
|
addresses in RPC output as well. No version 1 addresses should be created
|
||
|
for mainnet until consensus rules are adopted that give them meaning
|
||
|
(e.g. through [BIP 341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki)).
|
||
|
Once that happens, Bech32m is expected to be used for them, so this shouldn't
|
||
|
affect any production systems, but may be observed on other networks where such
|
||
|
addresses already have meaning (like signet).
|
||
|
|
||
|
0.21.1 change log
|
||
|
=================
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Consensus
|
||
|
- #21377 Speedy trial support for versionbits (ajtowns)
|
||
|
- #21686 Speedy trial activation parameters for Taproot (achow101)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### P2P protocol and network code
|
||
|
- #20852 allow CSubNet of non-IP networks (vasild)
|
||
|
- #21043 Avoid UBSan warning in ProcessMessage(…) (practicalswift)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Wallet
|
||
|
- #21166 Introduce DeferredSignatureChecker and have SignatureExtractorClass subclass it (achow101)
|
||
|
- #21083 Avoid requesting fee rates multiple times during coin selection (achow101)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### RPC and other APIs
|
||
|
- #21201 Disallow sendtoaddress and sendmany when private keys disabled (achow101)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Build system
|
||
|
- #21486 link against -lsocket if required for `*ifaddrs` (fanquake)
|
||
|
- #20983 Fix MSVC build after gui#176 (hebasto)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Tests and QA
|
||
|
- #21380 Add fuzzing harness for versionbits (ajtowns)
|
||
|
- #20812 fuzz: Bump FuzzedDataProvider.h (MarcoFalke)
|
||
|
- #20740 fuzz: Update FuzzedDataProvider.h from upstream (LLVM) (practicalswift)
|
||
|
- #21446 Update vcpkg checkout commit (sipsorcery)
|
||
|
- #21397 fuzz: Bump FuzzedDataProvider.h (MarcoFalke)
|
||
|
- #21081 Fix the unreachable code at `feature_taproot` (brunoerg)
|
||
|
- #20562 Test that a fully signed tx given to signrawtx is unchanged (achow101)
|
||
|
- #21571 Make sure non-IP peers get discouraged and disconnected (vasild, MarcoFalke)
|
||
|
- #21489 fuzz: cleanups for versionbits fuzzer (ajtowns)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Miscellaneous
|
||
|
- #20861 BIP 350: Implement Bech32m and use it for v1+ segwit addresses (sipa)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Documentation
|
||
|
- #21384 add signet to bitcoin.conf documentation (jonatack)
|
||
|
- #21342 Remove outdated comment (hebasto)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Credits
|
||
|
=======
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thanks to everyone who directly contributed to this release:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Aaron Clauson
|
||
|
- Andrew Chow
|
||
|
- Anthony Towns
|
||
|
- Bruno Garcia
|
||
|
- Fabian Jahr
|
||
|
- fanquake
|
||
|
- Hennadii Stepanov
|
||
|
- Jon Atack
|
||
|
- Luke Dashjr
|
||
|
- MarcoFalke
|
||
|
- Pieter Wuille
|
||
|
- practicalswift
|
||
|
- randymcmillan
|
||
|
- Sjors Provoost
|
||
|
- Vasil Dimov
|
||
|
- W. J. van der Laan
|
||
|
|
||
|
As well as to everyone that helped with translations on
|
||
|
[Transifex](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/).
|